Tradition Tuesday: Born To Run
I spent Father's Day not playing golf with my dad (he went to the wrong course) and having dinner with my father-in-law. And talking sports, apparently this is one holiday that gets a free pass when me and my father figures are allowed to go nuts on jock talk and The Wife doesn't shoot laser beams out of her eyes.
My dad isn't a big football guy. He watches the Broncos every week but refuses to live and die with the team, which is fine for him. He likes the NBA and the Spurs, but that series was so short and miserable we couldn't muster much enthusiasm or conversation out of it. He does dig on some auto racing, and you'll be subjected to much more of this later.
My father-in-law, on the other hand, is almost as big on the stick-and-ball games as I am. He's a huge baseball fan who follows the Cardinals, an Arizona State alum keeping tabs on the College World Series, and an absolute maniac when it comes to the Broncos. After a little baseball foreplay, we hammered out first hardcore NFL discussion since the Draft, and I came out of it with one conclusion:
Travis Henry is the key to the 2007 season.
There are many moving parts here, and many things that could go wrong. There are a dozen players who, if injured, could sink the season. The perpetual issues of pass rush and the return game are still there. There's a virtual rookie quarterback who could still go either way in his development. And the schedule contains dangerous trips to Indianapolis and Chicago as well as the standard vicious division battles.
But the potential is there for the old running game to resurface, and if the Broncos can get back to the magic number of five yards a carry as a team I think great things could be in store. The team hit averages of 5.0 and 4.8 in Portis' two years at altitude, but that's dipped to 4.4, 4.7 and 4.4 in the three years since his trade to Washington. The starters in those seasons have had nowhere near Portis' explosiveness.
Now Travis Henry is no '03 Portis either, but he does give the team a more skilled rushing option that the Bell/Bell combo of '06. I am by no means a Tatum Bell hater, and I do think his poisoned relationship with Coach Shanahan stifled his productivity as much as his constant injuries, but my observation was that the kid couldn't hit a hole. The Broncos O-Line has diminished in productivity itself, but I think the gaps were there last season and the Bells simply didn't hit them.
LT Matt Lepsis will return and hopefully maintain his health all season. George "Bust Of The Century" Foster's spot at RT might go to CSU product Erik Pears, Adam Meadows or rookie Ryan Harris. The inside will be ably manned by Ben Hamilton, Tom Nalen and the Chris Kuper/Montrae Holland platoon. These guys are getting older and were, save for Nalen, never that dominant to begin with. But The System is still The System, and they will cut and trap with precision and open those seams. The question is, Can Henry capitalize?
Before we get to him, I'd like to hit on the biggest addition to the Broncos' running game, and it's neither a back or a lineman. Dan Graham got hisself a big measty contract as a free agent, and the ex-Pat is known as one of the best blocking tight ends in the business. Combined with Tony Scheffler the in two-TE sets the Broncos will employ with regularity this season, Graham will wreak havoc with opposing linebackers and safeties on running plays. If Henry can find his crease and reach the second level, he'll find a slew of defenders unable to tackle him, because they will have been levelled by Dan Graham.
Now, to Henry. He's had three good seasons in his six years in the league: '02 and '03 in Buffalo and last year in Tennessee. His other seasons were tainted by injury and/or lack of opportunity. The composite average of those seasons is 309 carries for 1335 yards (4.3 per carry) and 10 TDs. Neither the Bill nor the Titans in those years had what you could call even an average NFL line, so I think you can bump Henry's stats by at least 10 per cent.
But can the team get its YPC back up to 5? The change-of-pace back is Mike Bell, who's not a home run threat. Jake Plummer, always a threat to scramble for a first down, is no longer in the mix. It's essentially up to Henry to hit the number on his own, and he hasn't done that since his last year at the University of Tennessee.
Should the running game coalesce and make the mark, this offense and team will fly. A dangerous ground attack will speed up Jay Cutler's development immeasurably, and give Javon Walker and Brandon Marshall much more room to roam. It will keep the defense off the field and allow Jim Bates' scheme more margin for error. Man, gameday at Invesco is really nice when the home team is running the football. The girls are prettier. The beer is colder. And Banky is extra grumpy. If God is, in fact, a Broncos fan, those orange sunsets will see Travis Henry to five yards a rush and the division is ours.
18 comments:
Keep dreaming pie-eyed Travis Henry lover.
T.H couldn't average five per carry even if he got to run downhill all season.
Graham is an excellent athlete though.
DfromKC
1500+ yds and 12 TD's for T.H. this year. Book it.
The skinny on T.H.
Other than that year (03 maybe?) with Bledsoe handing off and: Moulds, Price and some other receiver(that I drafted and told everyone would be awesome), T.H. is Sammy Winder minus the teammates.
Even if 5.0 YPC could get you a free cup of granola at Invesco, it won't explicitly give you an away win versus the Kansas City Chiefs.
The NFL is about wins, td's, yards, carries and then YPC...maybe.
Over-Under on T.H. 2007-
Carries-320
Yards- 1100
YPC-2.9
TD's-10
DfromKC
Over.
Over.
Over.
Over.
What does the four-leg pay 'round here?
Dude, go back and repeat 1st grade math. 1100 yds on 320 caries is 3.4 YPC, not your asinine 2.9.
2.9 YPC? No back in the league had a YPC that poor.
I will take the under on the total carries though. No sense running a guy into the ground like Herm is doing w/ Larry Johnson
DfromKC takin' a little heat. Holla.
Travis Henry? Seriously ... that's some funny shit.
You've actually managed to give me some hope for the Chiefs this year.
For that, Ol' No. 7, I offer you great thanks.
For Travis Henry, my friend, I offer my sincerest, heartfelt condolonces. The pain hasn't happened for you yet, but it will.
Cheers,
- The Lone Reader
OK..3:03AM posts, things get a little fuzzy. Actually tried dividing 1100 by 320, or vice versa. Eyeballed a number..sorry, got it wrong.
Point is, YPC is a toothless stat.
Strippers sure like hearin' about high YPC's, it gets thier nips and hoo-hah's all a-twitter.
To the meat and potatoes claims: yards and td's. Carries, and thus yards per, are silly things to bet on(methinks.)
So either I will take Testicles' under 1500yds, 12tds, or he will take my over 1100yds, 10 tds in '07.
I personally like door #1.
Fifty bucks.
Bring it Denver.
DfromKC
Why, exactly, is that so danged funny, Lone Reader? Where has Henry ever proved himself to be anything but a highly capable--if mildly injury-prone--back? Kansas City fans. Sheesh.
By the by, I never responded to your ludicrous contention that, because some of Bron-Bron's teammates hit a few shots *one* time, that the Cavs were somehow, some way, something other than what they really were: a mediocre team with one star that only got to the Finals by playing in the weakest conference in professional sports.
And then to add in a grauitous smack at 'Melo. Why you gotta be like that, LR? Why must you tear others down to make a (terrible) point? Anyone with a dram of basketball knowledge and sense knows that if the Nugs and the Cavs were to play a series, in some dream world of cross-conference seeding, the Cavs would be lucky to win 2 games. F'reals.
And you can say that about any of the teams that made the playoffs in the West. Golden State would have eviscerated that team. The Suns? Oh goodness. To say in Bron-Bron's defense that the Cavs would beat the Celtics...well, that's just pathetic. You and I could beat the Celtics. With Paul Pierce. Playing on 7-foot rims. In concrete sneakers.
Or ice skates.
Oh, DBrown--to defend total yards vs. yards per carry is silly.
YPC measures explosiveness. Total yards measures the ability to stay on the field. Not that it's a bad stat, but think of it this way: if a back plays all 16 games, and only gains, say, 70 yards per (hardly all-world) on average, that back will end up with 1,120 yards. Does that say Pro Bowl?
On the other hand, a 5-plus YPC is indicative of a few things: long carries, for one. Thus, a field-stretching presence. I would bet dollars to donuts (and honestly, who wouldn't?) that every NFL running back coach and offensive coordinator will take a back with a high YPC as opposed to one who grinds out yards inch by inch.
Thank you, Cecil, for addressing what had thus far been left out. That is, TH will likely not make it through the full season. Based on his past, seeing him start 16 games would be a mind-f**k. That said, I'll be surprised if he breaks 1000 yards.
Um...you'll be surprised if he breaks 1,000 yards?
Dude.
Let's just end all this nonsense here and now:
2001 Buffalo Bills 13 12 213 729 3.4 25 4 2 34
2002 Buffalo Bills 16 16 325 1438 4.4 34 13 10 72
2003 Buffalo Bills 15 15 331 1356 4.1 64 10 5 76
2004 Buffalo Bills 10 5 94 326 3.5 19 0 0 17
2005 Tennessee Titans 10 1 88 335 3.8 29 0 2 11
2006 Tennessee Titans 14 13 270 1211 4.5 70 7 9 48
TOTAL 78 62 1321 5395 4.1 70 34 28 258
Let's see: back-to-back 1300+ seasons on a bad team with no O-line whatsoever. Two consescutive years of being injured, and then a breakout season on another bad team with no O-line. (No way Vince Young was the Titans' MVP last year--it was Travis.)
His 4.5ish YPC (when healthy) is OK, and should get significantly better running behind a line designed to give a one-cut back like himself room to bolt. He's not a home run hitter, as the saying goes, but runs low and powerful, which will be a welcome change from Tatum Bell's upright pussytude.
I'm not saying he's gonna break Dickerson's record. But I do believe he'll break 1,300 yards this year, and 1,500 is a reasonable possibility. After all, two years ago, Mike Anderson and Tatum combined for over 2,000 total.
Those numbers mean nothing to me, mostly because I can't tell what they signify beyond the games started and total yards for the season. I merely wanted to point out that he's a running back going into his seventy season, which is dangerous enough as is.
The fact that he compiled said impressive numbers for shitty teams with no O-lins doesn't matter much when you consider he's going to be facing a lot more tough, tough defenses than he has been.
They're going to hit him in the mouth, and hit him hard. Being injury-prone, getting up there in age and facing tight run-oriented defenses equals a nice, shy-of-1000-yard campaign for the man you now refer to by first name.
Dude.
Allow me to redact myself...
*seventh
*O-lines
Sorry. Must've come down with a case of the Jarekpostrods.
Let's see: he just left a division where he had to play the Jaguars twice a year. Admittedly, the Colts and Texans aren't much--but before that, he played in a division against the Pats, Dolphins and Jets twice a year. Some pretty good run defenses there in the early aughts.
And which good run defenses do you mean, besides the Raiders and Chargers?
The one that wears red and gold; the one that was better than the orange and blue last year.
Post a Comment