Showing posts with label HFCD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label HFCD. Show all posts

Friday, October 2, 2009

Sleeping with the Enemy: Week Four, Giants @ Chiefs

Now that we've spent another week talking baseball and making lists of things nobody cares about, it's time to get back under center and chat some pigskin with another installment of "Sleeping with the Enemy." In case you were not aware, we sit down with a fan of the team that squares off against the Chiefs each week and wax gridiron. We also make predictions. Mine are always far from accurate while our guests are frequently close to right on the money.

This week's panelist is none other than the esteemed Wulfie, who is a fan of the New York Giants, shoots a pretty mean game of golf, and will beat the piss out of you if you a) send curse words to his work e-mail account, b) make fun of certain corporate ad campaigns, or c) try to talk him into squeezing some culture into his Saturday evening. He was, nevertheless, kind enough to take some time out of his beatin'-ass week to talk with the House of Georges. Our chat, after the jump.


Bankmeister: So, WulfieMan's Brother , start, if you would, by giving us a bit of background on yourself as a football fan. We know you root for the New York football Giants, but have you been a fan of the G-men your entire life? What are your three favorite NYG memories? What are your thoughts on your head coach, your quarterback, and your team in general with three (undefeated) games under your 2009 belt?

Wulfie: Something I generally would not fess up to, but I did stray away from the Giants when I was in like 2nd grade. I was a Cowboy fan...the whole America's team. I was too young to understand team loyalty. My Dad does not let me forget it, and still puts my Cowboy Lamp in my room when I go back home to visit. He likes to bust my balls. Other than that brief stint I have big a fan of the Big Blue Wrecking Crew my entire life. My favorite memories would have to be the '86 Superbowl, the '07 Superbowl, and the infamous Snowball game which I attended.



B: Ah, yes. Super Bowls. Something I know a lot about. You've had Phil Simms in one, Eli in another. Good stuff.

W: I think Eli Manning is a great QB, outside of Peyton and Brady there is no one else I would rather have at the helm of the offense. I never gave up on him either, I have loved him since the draft. Unlike our coach situation, which I was not happy about a couple of years ago. But results are results, and although I think he is a bit crazy he delivers the Ws. Three-and-Oh is a great start but the Broncos are 3-0 also so let's not make much of it.

B: Touche.

W: The highlight is definitely beating the 'Boys in their home opener. This is a huge win and one that could really help them prepare for other big games this season. Not to bust too much on your team and conference, but I am psyched we play the AFC West this year. I think we go 3-1 or 4-0 on that swing. I suppose it is possible for one of those teams to beat us in an off week although I think not one of those teams could come close to competing in the NFC East this year.

B: I appreciate the take on the AFC West, and I'm embarrassed to admit that you're correct. What once was a strong powerhouse of a division has slid beneath the sludge of now-strong-and-mighty NFL franchises. Your Giants squad looks tough thus far, and I'm still impressed with their ability to handle clubs on the road. Of course, I'm hoping that luck runs out for a minute on Sunday, but we'll see.

You mentioned the draft, and it would be out of character for me not to address this. My arch-nemesis, the Denver Broncos, were long-commandeered by one John -- Horse-faced Colts Draft, as I like to call him -- Elway. His career is forever a dagger in my spleen for two reasons. The most important/seldom-mentioned has been the inability/unwillingness for my franchise to draft and develop a top-tier starting quarterback. Ever. As in, they, in 50 years, have not done it. The second part is that Elway refused to play for the team that drafted him, which irritates me beyond words.

Football fans draw parallels to normal, everyday working guys way too often. It gets old, and I'm guilty of it, too, but still, as tired as it is, there's some validity to it. Let's take Belichick, for instance. If you, in your field, spied on your competitors, used their strategies to better your profits, and were caught and exposed, would you get slapped on the wrist and had one of next year's perks taken away from you? The same goes with this Crabtree kid. I don't know the specifics on it, but if he doesn't sign all year, re-enters the draft, gets taken, and signs a huge fat contract, well...I think that's just an abomination.

I don't have a problem with Eli; he doesn't play in my division or conference, but I can't help but lump him in with Elway for the aforementioned reasons. Please, let's have your take.

As far as Tom Coughlin, I've always respected him. I thought he did above-admirable work before he came to New York, and I felt bad for him every time the media talked about him losing the team, or ownership's gonna fire him, or what have you. I like the disciplinarian, even if his face does look like a Fuji apple in big games.

What about this receiving corps y'all have assembled in the absence of Mr. Burress? It seems like a pretty tight crew. Did you think Plax's sentence was fair? And Brandon Jacobs? Will he get the majority of the carries (if healthy) on the season, or will Ahmad Bradshaw emerge and eclipse him?

W: Pre-season the receivers were a huge question mark. We seemed to lack a deeper threat or a sure handed third down receiver. So far, Eli seems to be moving the ball around evenly and does not pose a problem. However the season is early, and I fear we need that large threat. Plaxico got what he deserved. Precedent needs to be set for all athletes/celebrities that they are accountable for their actions. Brandon Jacobs is a monster and I hope he gets most of the carries. He seems to warm up as the game goes on.

B: Um, so, no comment about Eli and the draft?

W: You're just sour grapes over Elway. There is nothing wrong with knowing what you want and going for it.

B: Alrighty then. How's this game gonna shake down?

W: I think the Giants D is likely to hold KC to under 13 points. Score prediction: 31-10.

B: Wow. The Chiefs can score a touchdown and a field goal more than the Buccaneers did against the Giants? If you say so. I'll stick with 10 points for the good guys, but imagine that the NYG'll drop a 34 on K.C., just like the Eagles did last week. Good times all around. Thanks for stopping by, and Go Giants. Go away, that is.
Read more

Friday, August 28, 2009

Friday Follow-Up: The Best Damn Thing Ever Written Period

If the Internets weren't spotted with great writers from which I could quote, I'm not sure what I'd do. Take Big Daddy Drew, for example. Love the guy. Never really got into his Peter King stuff over at Kissing Suzy Kolber, but most everything else he does rocks. His bits at Deadspin are no exception.

Take the "Why Your Football Team Sucks" series that's currently underway. Awesome. Yesterday's Green Bay Packers installment was phenomenal. I literally lost track of how many times I laughed out loud. When I was done, I considered writing to him to tell him about how much I hate the Denver Broncos. It turns out I was too late.

Some excerpts:

"I don't think I've ever seen an organization go from model franchise to baffling train wreck so quickly. Have you ever seen a new coach wear out his welcome faster than Josh McDaniels? Usually, it takes at least one regular season game before the fans start drunkenly calling for your big stupid head."


"The team just now suspended charming wife beater Brandon Marshall for the rest of the preseason for conduct detrimental to the team. Which leaves the Broncos a receiving corps of Eddie Royal and the cast of "Fame". It's a refreshing change from the days when the team brought in criminals like Maurice Clarett."


"During their late 90's Super Bowl title runs, the Broncos came to epitomize pretty much all of the annoying qualities of the Niners during their dynasty. Arrogant coach branded as some kind of genius/mastermind/guru/giant throbbing brain in a glass jar? Check. EXCESSIVE, ILLEGAL CUT BLOCKING? Check. Flagrant salary cap violations? Check. Lame end zone celebration? Check. (The Mile High Salute? Really?)"


"Sharpe won't visit his kids because he hates their mothers, but if he was a better dad, he'd feed them too much gravy and kill them. Awesome."

"The irony of John Elway's horseteeth and Shannon Sharpe's horseteeth together on a team with a Horse for a mascot, Terrell Davis' knees and braces, Barrelman, Fans shouting INCOMPLETE in unison...Fuck the Broncos, and fuck Colorado."


Hell. Fuck. Yeah. That's just what my Friday needed: A gigantic post of the shit I've always said in somebody else's handwriting.
Read more

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Historically Speaking: Don't Call It a Comeback. No, Really -- Don't

Time now for another installment of America's favorite feature, the one that keeps sweeping the Webs, climbing the charts -- with a bullet -- and putting smiles on faces around the world. We've got a bit to cover today so let's-- Now, wait a minute. I've just been handed an urgent bulletin. Bare with me now. This is going to be a bit rough to stomach. It turns out, in addition to cheating on the field, amassing immeasurable units of referee-sauteed home-cooking, and having a jerk-laden fan base, the Denver Broncos Football Club also cheats in the stats room. Amazing. Never saw that coming.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled boredom.

* Today in 1920, representatives from four professional football clubs gathered in Canton, Ohio for a meeting. The result was the American Professional Football Association, which, after two years of that dumb name, became the more clever-sounding National Football League.

* Today in 1948, 78,000-plus gathered at Municipal Stadium in Cleveland for a contest between the Indians and the White Sox. On the hill for the Tribe was Satchel Paige, who tossed the fourth consecutive shutout for the Indians in front of the largest night-game Major League Crowd ever.

* Today in 1974, California Angel Nolan Ryan tallied 19 Ks in a game against the Detroit Tigers, an 11-inning, 1-0 loss for the Halos. It was the third time that season that Ryan had fanned 19 batters, but don't let that fool you: He was the most overrated pitcher in MLB history. Don't come at me with your opinions. These here are facts. The truth has been spoken.

* Six years later, a cat by the name of Omar Moreno swiped his 70th base of the season in a Pittsburgh Pirate uniform. Moreno compiled a 71-steal season in '77, Pirated six more the following year, and closed the '80 campaign with a career-high 96 steals, which is pretty impressive. I went to compare his stats with one R. N. H. Henderson, but the numbers were not visible; it appeared someone had saturated his pages with quarts and quarts of semen.

* Today in 1982, Don Lever became the first captain of the New Jersey Devils. Lever had previously been a Vancouver Canuck, both an Atlanta and a Calgary Flame, and a Colorado Rocky for 22 games before the franchise again moved. He logged his final two seasons in a Buffalo Sabre uniform, and tallied 680 points, 593 PIMs, and played in '82's All-Star Game.

And your Sports Illustrated quote of they day came from the mouth of...



...former St. Louis Cardinals pitcher Lee Smith, who, in 1990 was awarded a $7.8 million contract. Asked if the contract added pressure to his game, Smith said, "I was born under pressure. My mom wanted a girl."
Read more

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

The Hog25: The 25 Best Quarterbacks Of The Past 25 Years (Part Two)

The Iron Triangle of the House of Georges likes to argue. A lot. We bicker over whether that last call was home cookin' or a feat of unbiased umpiring. We quarrel about whose turn it is to buy the next round of drinks. But most of all, we match wits on the topic of greatness: Bonds or Rose? Coke or Pepsi? Neil Diamond or Sergio Mendes? And so we three set off on an epic journey, a quest to rank the Top 25 of the past quarter-century in a variety of our favorite sports and cultural topics. Today's lucky target: NFL Quarterbacks.

Welcome back! We hope you enjoyed yesterday's installment of the HoG25, in which we detailed QBs 25 through 11 over the past 25 years. Today we're back for the big boys, the top 10 signal-callers of our collective sports-watching lives. Feel free to leave your own list in the comments.



10. WARREN MOON

Old No. 7: Does Warren Moon belong in the top 10 here, ahead of Aikman and Big Ben, who won five combined Super Bowls? I argue yes, and here again, from our internal deliberations, is that argument:

I think Warren Moon was better than those guys (Aikman, Randall, Big Ben). Of course all but Randall made multiple Super Bowls and won at least one title, and I think that's huge. But it's not the end-all of judging a QB's career. Warren Moon was a terrific college QB at Washington but he came out in 1979, before Doug Williams won a ring and at a time when most of the league was not ready to trust a black quarterback. He went to Canada and put up monster, stupid, ridiculous video-game numbers. I know those numbers don't really count, just like Ichiro's Japanese stats won't truly count when his career is over and we're measuring him against the all-time greats. But I just feel like those Oiler teams were terrific and should have made at least one Bowl had their coaching staff not been made up of glue-sniffing dolts.


It’s kind of fun to quote oneself. As to those Canadian numbers: 21,228 yards, 144 TDs, 9-1 in the playoffs. Or maybe it was meters, or fathoms, or however the fuck they measure football up there. Regardless, as a professional quarterback, Warren Moon threw for 70,553 yards. Seventy thousand yards. If you gave me a million dollars, a football, Eddie Royal running slant patterns and no defense I doubt I could throw for seventy thousand yards before my arm fell off.

9. KURT WARNER

Old No. 7: I was perfectly fine writing Kurt Warner off as a fluke. Sure, he won a Super Bowl, a Super Bowl MVP, and two league MVP awards. But he came out of nowhere, and as soon as Marshall Faulk and Dick Vermeil vanished from St. Louis he seemed done. He held a seat warm for Eli Manning in New York, then took a job to do the same for Matt Leinart in Arizona.


And I was ready to assign him to a peculiar footnote of history, when a never-was QB led a ramshackle bunch of misfits to a couple of crazy-wacky offensive years. The Rams capitalized on a version of the NFL that wasn’t very good, when the 90s dynasties of the Cowboys and Broncos were finished and this decade’s great teams, the Patriots and the Colts, weren’t yet ready. Once the league caught on to Warner’s act, he looked old and tired and average, and “fluke” seemed like the perfect description for his flourish in 2001 and 2002.

But then Kurt Warner took the Arizona Cardinals to the Super Bowl, and damn near won the game.

Put yourself at any point in time prior to 2009 and read that previous sentence to yourself. It’s just about the most batshit nutty thing I’ve ever heard. Combine it with great numbers, and Warner is legendary. He’s the second-most accurate passer in the history of the NFL behind Chad Pennington, and Chad Pennington has never attempted a throw longer than six yards. Sure, he’s short of 30,000 NFL passing yards, but that’s only because of all the years he spent matriculating in the Arena and Hy-Vee Grocery leagues. Don’t make me bust out those stats, Warner may well have thrown for six hundred thousand combined yards.

8. JIM KELLY

Bankmeister: Ah. Jim Kelly. The first (and only) 1983-drafted quarterback I get to write about in this feature. Jim Kelly was fantastic. A sure hit coming out of college. Dude chucked almost 4000 yards and for 44 touchdowns in high school. High school. I don’t think my high school football team has scored 44 touchdowns since I graduated. He too matriculated at the University of Miami, and for that I will not fault him. I will, however, fault him for two things: 1) temporarily refusing to play for the team that drafted him, and 2) being solely responsible for the Chiefs losing at my first-ever professional football game. But that’s cool. What can you say about Kelly? He’s a five-time Pro Bowler. He won four consecutive AFC Championships. He heaved a pigskin for a living and did so very well for 11 seasons. He amassed over 35,000 passing yards, 237 scores, and a career passer rating of 84.4, which is higher than Elway’s. Jackpot. Count it, etc.

He also once led the league in passing touchdowns with 33 (1991), and in the previous campaign, hung a rating of 101.2 in the books, which is pretty impressive. I wasn’t playing fantasy football when Jim Kelly was wearing number 12, but if I had been, I would’ve drafted him and made him my keeper. He was an amazing quarterback that played for a really unfortunate team. Cleveland’s cousin, I suppose. But he’s a first-ballot Hall of Famer, and by golly, he earned that. He makes this list 100 percent of the time, and 60 percent of the time, he’s in the top 10 every time.

7. TOM BRADY

Old No. 7: I’m a Red Sox fan, but that’s my only interaction with the reviled and maligned species of subhuman sports booster that comes from Boston. I don’t like the Pats or the Celtics, and therefore I look at someone like Tom Brady the way I look at someone like Derek Jeter. He’s awesome, he’s robotically efficient, I respect him, I loathe him.

Brady and Jeter occupy the same rarefied airspace as both champion athletes and tabloid celebrities. They both carry themselves like true superstars: aloof, never controversial, complete dicks. If I were fortunate enough to be that good, I’d like to think that’s how I’d behave myself—banging supermodels, laughing at poor people, but always behind closed doors and never making an ass out of myself. Even when Brady knocked up Bridget Moynahan everyone was like “leave the man alone, respect his privacy,“ almost like the broad was fortunate to be inseminated by such a suave and worldly man. Which she was.

Oh, he’s absorbed a few body blows recently. Brady’s Patriots have now lost three whole playoff games--I was in attendance at the first, and as we all exited Invesco that night it felt awfully strange that Jake Plummer had outdueled the great Tom Brady. A similar feat was accomplished by Elisha Manning two Super Bowls ago, and Brady deserves at least some culpability for delivering an unbeaten team to the shadow of the mountaintop yet failing to reach the summit. And last year, after Brady was felled by the dirtiest hit you’ll ever see, Matt Cassel won 11 games with Brady’s teammates, a poor man’s version of Hostetler taking Phil Simms’ Giants to a title.



But Brady is unquestionably great and is this generation’s Montana -- a diamond in the rough, discovered by a coaching legend, who cashed in when it counted with a dynasty. That’s not as easy as it sounds, the mid-80s Bears should have been a dynasty but only collected one Vince Lombardi Trophy, and a big reason for that is because Jim McMahon was not a great quarterback.

6. STEVE YOUNG

Bankmeister: Growing up, I didn’t have any ties to the San Francisco 49ers, but I do now. A lot of that is thanks to the brain trust I mentioned under the Rich Gannon listing. Thanks to them, we’ve had the pleasure of cheering for Joe Montana and Elvis Grbac. We’ve also had the nausea of admitting that yes, Steve Bono was once at the helm of a 13-3 Kansas City Chiefs team. I haven’t heard much of him since, but I’m told you can see pictures of Bono and Lin Elliot if you type the words lemon, party , and org into your CyberNets browser and plop a period in there somewhere. So as a Chiefs fan, we got Montana for a minute, and that was awesome. It was. Conference championship game. Thanks for the memories. It was great watching him lead the Chiefs, but great in that kind of way where someone comes home right in the middle of a galactic jerk session. Sure. You’ve had thousands of others. A lot of ‘em were good ones, but you want that one. Why couldn’t you’ve gotten that one? Bad analogy? Okay. How ‘bout the SportsCenter you tune into just to see that fantastic diving catch in center field that your buddy told you about at the bar, except, on the way to watch it, you flip past a stupid channel with a stupid program you would never, ever watch, except for right now, there’s a smokin’ brunette with a giant cleave-heavy rack. You’re distracted. Joe Montana was on the verge of selling me a Buick Skylark, but over there, in the corner, was this shiny convertible Corvette.

That’s how I’ll always think of Steve Young. I wanted that guy on my team. Yesterday.

Steve Young was the perfectly polished Mark Brunell, only with more God-given talent. He was wise, football savvy and one gutsy-ass motherfucker. Now, I’m not sure if that last part cut his career short, or if he just has the kind of noodle that doesn’t recover well from traumas, or if it was both. It was probably both. But Steve Young had some courage. And it would be a shame to not look at his numbers. Thirty-three thousand yards passing, 232 touchdowns, and 97 picks. Don’t forget the 4239 rushing yards and 43 rushing touchdowns, either. Or the seven consecutive Pro Bowls, the 96.8 career passer rating, the 8-6 post-season record, or the two-time league MVP, and Super Bowl XXIX MVP.

In terms of raw talent, Steve Young is one of the best quarterbacks I’ve ever seen play. It’s a shame that two years of his career were wasted in Tampa Bay and it took him four years to get the official starting nod in San Francisco. If by playing in those first six seasons, his head didn’t turn into lumpy gravy, he may’ve become the best to ever play the game. May’ve.

And for those that like to diss him as a sportscaster, fuck off. What? You really have good reasons why he sucks at the desk. Seriously. Fuck. Off.

5. DAN MARINO

Old No. 7: Why is Dan Marino always so angry? He had a legendary career and got to play the whole time in Miami, where the weather’s nice, the fans and media are cushy and I hear there are girls. He made a ton of money. He was handed a job right after retirement where he makes a million dollars a year to work one day a week in the fall. He’s tanned, he has his hair, and since the Nutrisystem he’s trim. So why does he always look like someone kicked his puppy?



Is it because guys like me always call him a loser? I’m just a lowly blogger, he should have a thicker skin. Is it because guys like Boomer Esiason essentially say the same thing? That might sting a little more, since Boomer actually played the game at a high level and was sitting right next to Marino when he said it. Still, though, compare Marino to Jim Kelly and Warren Moon, the only other cats in our top dozen who don’t have a ring. I don’t see Kelly and Moon walking around with a perpetual scowl, scaring all the kids in the neighborhood. They’re gracious and humble, and although either would give their throwing arm for a single title on their resume, they have a better perspective on the whole thing.

If you’re a quarterback, especially one of the all-time greats, you have a responsibility to your team and your city to represent both with class. You’re the face of the franchise and you should act like a grown up. If you want to bitch in private that dumb old Don Shula couldn’t hack it at the end (he couldn’t) or that your teams were not built for road weather in January (they weren’t) or that you never got to play with a single decent running back (you didn’t), that’s fine. Just don’t broadcast that shit every day, it makes you look like a bitch.

But whatever, he had incredible stats.

4. PEYTON MANNING

Old No. 7: I used to be hatin’ on Peyton with every ounce of energy I could muster. I once stood through an entire Broncos-Colts game screaming “Cut That Meat!” even though Indy had already clinched their playoff position and Manning only played a token possession before yielding to Jim Sorgi. I cringed at his stupid commercials, I pleaded for his gruesome injuries, I begged that God would make him suck.

But he didn’t suck, and in the Bloach Bowl he grabbed himself a shiny ring. You see a lot of great players finally win it all and wonder how it will change both them and others’ perceptions of them. To me, Peyton picked up a swagger and a confidence that he’d always tried to fake. He was more at ease with his teammates, less of a punk with his coaches and officials, and completely comfortable with his status as an icon.

But what about me, charter member of the Fuck You Peyton Society? I have to admit, I now like the guy. I still want him to lose, but no longer to I wish that his leg snaps in half while that happens. Once in a while I crack a smile when he’s on my television—he continues to be a gigantic dork but he is capable of genuine humor from time to time. And I must cop to the fact that Peyton Manning is the best pure quarterback I have ever seen. Elway and Favre were better overall football players, leaders of men, but when it comes to the science of matriculating a football to an exact point in three-dimensional space, no one has ever done it better. I am perfectly at peace with my new relationship with Peyton Manning. Me and him, we’re bros.


One more note, about guys here that were the No. 1 draft pick. We have five players on this list that were drafted first overall: Bledsoe (1993), Vinny ('87), Aikman ('89), Peyton ('98) and Elway ('83). Two of those guys fell into secretly great situations because of coaching changes--Bledsoe was inherited by Parcells, while Aikman launched his career with fledgling pro coach Jimmy Johnson. Elway ended up with Dan Reeves, who wasn't an all-time great coach but wasn't Frank Kush either. That leaves Vinny Testaverde and Peyton Manning as the two QBs that, in my opinion, did the most with the least (both Tampa and Indy were pathetic upon their arrival). And since Vinny did his best work long after leaving the Buccaneers, you could argue that no quarterback has ever had as much to do with building a franchise as Peyton Manning has.

I know, Peyton didn't draft Edgerrin James or Reggie Wayne or Dwight Freeney or Bob Sanders. Peyton didn't make intelligent decisions with free agency or upgrade from Jim Mora to Tony Dungy. But without Manning's excellence and consistency, none of that would have happened. The Colts would not have brand-new Lucas Oil Stadium, or a championship, and they very well might not be in Indianapolis at all. Measured that way, Peyton Manning might go down as the most important player in NFL history. That, or I'm just grasping at straws because I'm out of players here.

3. BRETT FAVRE

Cecil: Brett Favre was not the greatest QB I’ve ever seen. Nor is he the “toughest” as everyone likes to call him -- both of those honorifics belong to Mr. Elway, who played the vast majority of his career behind reprehensibly bad offensive lines and took an evil beating therefore -- he was, however, as close as the NFL has had, might ever have, to #7.

Not just because of his playing style, although the two were similarly strong-armed and (especially in their youth), gutsy and occasionally maddening. Not just because he said himself that he believed that Elway was his closest comparison, and not because he possessed a similar joie de football.


Nope, it’s because of something bigger: like Elway, Favre was as much an area as a person. Brett Favre was the Green Bay Packers, the Upper Midwest, the frozen tundra. We forget that all of those shopworn NFL Films clichés were ancient history in the early ‘90s, because the Pack had been terrible since they beat the Raiders in the second Super Bowl, but they were—the notion of “Titletown” was a laugh, and the franchise itself moribund. Brett Favre—and, of course, Reggie White, but we aren’t rating DEs—changed that. He reinvigorated a franchise that is arguably the NFL’s Greatest of All Time, made viable for a modern era.

He may not be John Elway. But he’s close. A hell of a lot closer than that system-dependent fraud Joe Montana.

2. JOE MONTANA

Bankmeister: Let’s cut to the chase. Joe Montana was the perfect quarterback. Okay. So he threw some picks. One hundred thirty-nine of them to be exact. Nobody’s perfect. But imagine that Phil Simms scenario I mentioned. All the right pieces are in place. Killer D. Ultimate coach. Sleeper tight ends, awesome line. And you plug Peyton Manning in there. Who’s gonna stop you, right? Well, there’s one small difference, and that’s that Joe Montana was called Joe Cool, and not Kenny Chesney fan fuck-tard teammate hollerer. Actually, I’ve heard that, off the field, Joe was not all that cool, but for a brief, waning moment, he had the Chiefs on the doorstep, and then he got hurt, and it was time to call it a career. A pretty tight, four-Super Bowl-winning, three-time-SB-MVP career, but a career, nonetheless.

Here’s the thing I liked about Montana. He couldn’t run. He totaled 1676 rushing yards in his career. That’s about 111 yards a season, or just under seven yards a game. Better yet, less than two yards a quarter. But he didn’t need to. He could stay in the pocket. He could get flushed out of it as it collapsed and make it far enough to either sideline and beat you with his arm and his brains. Those late ‘80s Giants teams pissed me off because they would hit you in the mouth on the lines and get enough done on offense to win, and win a pair of championships, to boot. On the other coast, San Francisco was just freaking dominating people. They went 100-39 on Montana’s watch. This wasn’t too say that they would come out and kick your ass every Sunday. But some Sundays they would. And some Sundays they’d just find the right way, the perfect means, to beat you.


This was the problem with Martyball. It was semi-Parcellsian. It was smash mouth, but it wasn’t hit you in the mouth and then take care of business. Montana was the answer. He was the raise on the poker table, the big fish in the barrel. And he’d missed the entire 1991 season. The fact that he came to Kansas City and led the team to a 17-8 regular-season record (2-2 in the playoffs) between the ages of 37 and 38 was flippin’ stellar. He’d accomplished most everything. Maybe that two-point NFC Conference Championship loss to New York en route to that ’90 Giants Super Bowl left him hungry for number five. Maybe he wanted to win one for another team. Maybe he just wanted a paycheck.

Can’t be certain either way, but as the fan of a team who’s never drafted and (successfully) developed a quarterback in its history, it was epic having him here. Forty thousand, five hundred fifty-one passing yards, a 273:139 TD-INT ratio, and eight Pro Bowls says most of it. But the poise under pressure, the 16-7 post-season record, and the drive to win says the rest. Montana, with all of the weapons around him in San Francisco and in Kansas City, was a fantastic quarterback to watch. Fantastic.

1. JOHN ELWAY

Cecil: Even yet, John Elway stands astride the civic self-image of the Rocky Mountain Region like no individual I can think of; maybe back in the frontier days people got all worked up talking about Buffalo Bill Cody, I dunno, but in my lifetime, there’s been no one like him. He was, and remains, bigger than football.

It’s no secret that we’re pretty far away from the rest of the country out here. The closest metropolitan areas are Salt Lake to the West, Albuquerque to the south and Kansas City to the east, all more than 500 miles away--and none considered any sort of teeming megalopolis. When it comes to the popular image of the Mountain West, the American public thinks skiing and Bronco football. And John Elway.

I don’t make a habit of agreeing with Jason Whitlock. I think he’s a charlatan who impersonates a journalist and surfs onto whatever controversy he can find in order to take some bogus “last honest man” stance.

But I’ll say this much: the dude is right on when he says that John Elway is the greatest player in the history of the modern NFL. Because that claim, while based in quantitative numbers (most wins as a starter and second most passing yards when he retired, started five Super Bowls with teams that were largely unworthy of being in the postseason at all) goes beyond mere production on the field; it speaks to the vast impact that Elway had on this city, this region. John Elway's professional legacy is beyond compare.


Read more

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Wednesday Whatnot: Chiefs Pick Broncos Game For DT Celebration

The Kansas City Chiefs Football Club has announced it will honor the late Derrick Thomas by retiring his number and presenting his family with Thomas' Hall of Fame ring on December 6 when the Chiefs host the Broncos at Arrowhead Stadium. the question is...



...who had the better semi-mullet in 1990: Carl Peterson or John Elway?

(clip courtesy of Arrowhead Pride)
Read more

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Tradition Tuesday: The Pink Polo Picks

Gather 'round, kids. Amidst all of this baseball jibber-jabber, it's time for everyone's favorite House of Georges stronghold: Tradition Tuesday.

If this is your first time inside the House, allow me: The rough focus of this blog is the rivalry between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Denver Broncos. Long ago, in a galaxy far, far away, The Tradition -- wherein Cecil and Seven matriculate out to the Truman Sports Complex to cheer for the Broncos, and I, in my woolen cap, get beer thrown on me at Mile High Stadium while I cheer for the Chiefs -- was born. It's a grand old time twice a year. And 60 percent of the time, the home team wins all the time. We smoke pork, tobacco, and the occasional bowl of drugs. We drink Pabst. We sometimes invite the wives, and when we don't, we promptly visit the local nudie bar set up a volunteer booth at an urban intersection in a neighborhood of need and provide warm meals and counseling.

The games our one of our few remaining outlets of diversion, and in an effort to keep the thread alive around the calendar, we bring you Tradition Tuesday, our weekly state-of-the-rivlary address.


Today is Tuesday, April 7. There's a point to my mentioning it, and you'll see it in due time. Like right now: Bob Gretz has a piece over at the Chiefs Web site, and it has some interesting news. That news pertains to the jersey digit(s) selection of the Chiefs new quarterback. Now, before we get into it, let's take a second and remember that Chiefs Head Coach Todd Haley has said that Matt Cassel has not been automatically awarded the starting job; he'll have to earn it.

If and when you go to Gretz's story, though, it's interesting to think about players' preferences, and ultimately, their options when it comes to picking shirt numerals. Like Joe Montana when he came to town, Old No. 16 is forever unavailable to Kansas City signal-callers. Montana, as you may know, went with 19. Now, keep in mind that I've done zero research on this. What? That's protocal around here. But there were, post-Montana, a few boneheads that came in and threw the ball around.

Steve Bono, chucklehead that he was, wore number 13, which, for the superstious, is kind of like saying "Hey, set up a ladder behind me so that every time I take a snap, I back up through it." Or, "Make sure a black cat runs across the field after each huddle break." Or, you break a mirror in the locker room. Maybe you knock over the salt at the Saturday-night team dinner table. You get the point.

Elvis Grbac. I'm not sure what he was thinking. As a San Francisco 49er, he wore 18. When he got to Kansas City, it must've been spoken for, because he went with 11. But then he switched to 18. For his brief, final stint as a Baltimore Raven, he was again, 18. Perhaps his favorite player as a kid wore 18. I dunno. In comes Trent Green, who wore 10. Ten's a nice, round number, one that he has worn his entire career. Or at least I think he has. His successor, Brodie Croyle, wore 11 in college, 12 in the pros, which is kind of like saying that he was taking it to the next level after Alabama, and well, we all know how that worked out for him.

Next was Tyler Thigpen. Did he pick four because of Brett Favre? Perhaps he did, and if that's accurate, it would subscribe to the theory once voiced by our very own Old No. 7, which was something along the lines of "All these young, up-and-coming quarterbacks these days are wearing seven because of their favorite quarterback growing up: John Elway." I of course, called hogwash on the theory, and asked for some non-Wikipedia, HTML-formatted, researched-and-substantiated evidence, to which he replied: "Well, there's J.P. Losman, Mike Vick..." And that was kind of the end of that conversation.

But now, several years later, the not-yet-admitted-by-the-suits, quote/unquote quarterback of the Kansas City Chiefs has selected his number, and yes -- you guessed it, it's seven. No, no. I kid you not. You can actually buy one already, here. Cassel, as Gretz reports, will be the 11th guy to don that digit, and "Combined they played in 47 games, or less than one game for each of the 49 seasons of games in franchise history." Gretz also reminds us that "The last guy to wear No. 7 was kicker Justin Medlock, who survived the opening game of the 2007 season and was released, one of the biggest kicking failures in Chiefs history."

As Gretz's column suggests, seven is a lucky number in some cultures, religions. Whether or not it will be for Cassel is of course, yet to be seen. I'm interested to know what Chiefs fans think, so as you're all so prone to do, flood the comments with your opining.
Read more

Thursday, December 4, 2008

In the Thick of Things Tradition: (most of) The 80s

I don't fully understand how this post, once complete and publish-ready, hovered there for most of 12 hours yesterday, and then is gone this morning, forcing me to write it again and pre-date it. I guess, it's somewhat similar to Todd Blackledge in that regard. I mean, we're talking Chiefs-Broncos football here. We're breaking down one of the best rivalries in recent (Editor's Note: By "recent," I mean stop looking at around season end 2005.) times, and what better way to do that than begin with the infamous quarterback draft of 1983, and move forward. Thing is, I won't be able to re-create the undying with and keen insight with which I originally crafted this post, but I'll make heartfelt efforts to let you know that I'm trying, much like Blackledge's Penn State flashiness never really translated to the pros. Anyway, 1983. I pick that year because Traditionally, I would compile some numbers to show how, back in the day, the Chiefs would almost always beat the Broncos by the rough score of 117-2, and in would come the colleague-inspired commentary with the token lines like "Yeah, but what about post-Model-T-invention football," or "Dude, all that happened before we were born," or the always-swell "Sure, but your team cheated by having Gatorade invented for them, then payed league high-ups for years, filling Canton with Chief busts while our deserving Bronco martyrs are annually left out in the Ohio cold."

So I thought, let's remove the hats and canes from the stage, and start with '83.

The Chiefs drafted Blackledge with the seventh overall pick (Note: Redacted) of that NFL draft, six picks after the Baltimore Colts took John Elway out of Stanford. Elway, as we all know, did not lead the Colts to many Super Bowl losses, eventually two right-before retirement victories, and walk away from the game, handing the franchise keys to one Peyton Manning. For the record, a few of the other QBs the Chiefs passed on include Jim Kelly, Tony Eason, Ken O'Brien, Dan Marino (Note: Redacted), and I think even Gary Kubiak was in that mix. But bygones and whatnot, right?

At the conclusion of the '82 season, Chief management decided that Marv Levy was not a good coach, and fired him. Nice. In came John Mackovic to replace Levy, and in October of that season, the tradition of early-season (typically narrow) Chief losses in Denver, coupled with late-season Bronco losses in KC, was really starting to sprout. In October 1983, Chiefs quarterback Bill Kenney threw for 365 yards, but the visitors fell to the home team, 24-27. When the teams visited Arrowhead, the Chiefs thumped Denver 48-17 before a still-record-low crowd of 11, 377 fans. The Chiefs called it a season at 6-10, while in Denver, the Broncos' nine-win campaign got them a wildcard berth, but they would fall to the Seahawks, courtesy of solid afternoons from Steve Largent, Dave Krieg, and the original Curt Warner.

The following year, in September, Denver took advantage of a solid afternoon from Sammy Winder while ignoring an admirable effort from Blackledge, blanking the Chiefs 21-0. By mid-November, however, Bill Kenney was back under center for KC, and they scarcely beat the Broncos at Arrowhead despite another afternoon of Winder up the middle. This time, they appreciated 126 receiving yards from Carlos Carson, and hung on to win, 19-16. They'd close the season at 8-8, while Denver took a big step forward, finishing at 13-3. Unfortunately for them, they hosted the Steelers in the divisional playoff, and took a 17-24 loss at the hands of Pittsburgh, home of pedophiles -- I mean, pierogies.

Moving right along. There have, in this specimen of two teams playing each other bi-annually, been occasions for a sweep, and 1985 is one of them. Denver travelled to Kansas City first in '85, and handled KC 30-10, then beat them again at Mile High in December, another close one, 14-13. Before 69,000, John Elway put up one of many 300-yard passing days, while Vance Johnson enjoyed his performance to the tune of 116 receiving yards. Kansas City was again relegated to a 6-10 campaign, while Denver, despite 11 victories, was left out of the post-season.

The balance to the rivalry was restored in 1986, as the Chiefs travelled to Denver in November, and promptly lost, 17-38. But, Denver was back in KC for their oft-annual woe, this one in the form of a 10-37 beating. Kansas City, showing some poise under Mackovic, puts together a 10-win season, making the playoffs as a wildcard. It was, however, a contest they quickly regretted, the 35-15 walloping the Jets game them causing a long flight home from New York. Denver, however, took another big step forward. Though they won 11 games in consecutive years, this time they had the division edge, and advanced to the post-season, handling the defending-AFC-champ Patriots in the divisional playoff, and eclipsing Cleveland by a field goal in some sort of mildly famous fashion in the conference championship. They would, however, meet their demise in the form of Bill Parcell's Giants in the Super Bowl, regardless of huge games from Elway and Vance Johnson.

Though things looked better in '86 for the Chiefs, they decided to go a different direction in '87; after firing Mackovic, they promoted their, um, special teams coach to the head rank, which in hindsight, was ingenius. In this spectacle of a season, Denver came to Kansas City early, and won, though it was backup quarterback/scab Ken Karcher under center, he of the 275-yard afternoon, connecting with receiver Bobby Micho for 100+. This of course was another one of those sweep years, and a trip to Denver for the Chiefs proved another close one (17-20) but a loss for the red and gold, no less. The strike caused clubs to miss a contest that year, likely all the better for the Chiefs as they finished at 4-11. Denver, though, went down a path familiar to them. With and without starters, they put together 11 wins, and lubed the visiting Oilers in the divisional playoff, only to face the same Browns again in the conference championship. It was another game for the ages as Cleveland's Bernie Kosar put up 365 passing yards, while Denver's Mark Jackson caught for 134, the Broncos getting the edge on a late-game Earnest Byner fumble, 38-35. Their luck again ran out in the Super Bowl, this time against Doug Williams and the Redskins.

As much as I like analyzing Denver successes, I'd much rather focus on four-win Chief seasons, like, take 1988 for example. Denver again travelled to KC early, and courtesy of Steve "Master of Play Action" DeBerg (Note: Todd who?), the Chiefs prevailed by a touchdown, 20-13. Kansas City kindly returned the favor later in the season though, falling 11-17 at Mile High. Both clubs were left out of the playoffs as Denver mustered a mere seven wins.

Finally, 1989. I say "finally" because wholesale changes are made at One Arrowhead Drive as Carl Peterson comes to town as GM. His first move would be to hire Marty Schottenheimer as head coach. I also say it because this season would mark the third Denver sweep of Kansas City in seven seasons, and anytime we can get away from those numbers is just dandy by me. The Denver game is the season-opener; the Chiefs fall 20-34. The game in KC is a Denver win by a field goal, 16-13. The Chiefs manage to show some improvement, finishing the year in the black, 8-7-1, while the Broncos put together an impressive 12-win effort, beat up on Cleveland some more in the AFC title game, get smoked in the Super Bowl again, blah, blah, blah.

There. An illustrious decade in the books. From the point of the '83 draft to the end of the 80s, Denver gets the nod with 10 victories to KC's four, three sweeps to the Chiefs' none.
Read more

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Tradition-al Side Effects: The Top Ten Worst Things About Games at InVesCo

The work just keeps crankin' itself out here in Tradition Week, and I've compiled a list of loathsome things I subject myself -- and on occasion my wife -- to at least once a year, and they are all tied very tightly to attending football contests at InVesCo Field at Mile High Stadium. It's quite possible that I've, at one time or another in the past, listed each of these things in one post or another. It's also quite possible that I don't care; I'm sayin' 'em again. Don't get me wrong, here. I love these games, and I would one day like for my team to win one of them, because that would be awesome, the largest, most grandeur of monkeys off of my pasty, hairy, non-physiqued back. Therefore, without any further ado, I bring you "The Top Ten Worst Things About Games at InVesCo." But, you'll have to click your mouse to read them.

Number Ten: The Digs


I once had the pleasure of attending a Chiefs game at the Old Mile High. That was an awesome stadium. InVesCo is but a poorly engineered pile of plastic heap in comparison, one that reeks of corporate newness and outright lameness.



The Broncos won a ton of playoff games there. The place was raucous and downright frightening. InVesCo, with its cheap, hollowish-plastic floors that facilitate the supreme gayness of Rocky Mountain Thunder, totally, completely blows.

Number Nine: The Lot

Now, InVesCo, like Mile High sits in the heart of downtown Denver, so the possibility of having sprawling acres of parking like we do at Arrowhead seems, well, un-possible. I can't imagine, however, a design more poorer than the one in place.



There are roughly 179 "lots" to park in at the new Mile High, and each costs the equivalent of a season ticket per game to stow your vehicle and belongings in. I'm not going to sit here and wax tailgating, because any smart fan in any city can tailgate well, and my Mile-High companions do just that. There's just little convenience attached to the process.

Number Eight: Getting Tickets

One great thing about tickets to Chiefs games is that our crew seldom has to worry about not sitting together. Now, it's possible that there's a direct correlation to the winning and non-winning of the franchises here, but I'm not trying to be logical. No, stubborn and grudge-holding is more my forte. But don't sell me obstructed-view seats. And please, every once in a while, throw a guy a bone.



I'm already at a higher elevation in the parking lot. When I finally get to my nosebleed seats, I don't want to be reminded that I'm a fat, out-of-shape, chain-smoking midwesterner (who still has time and occasion to marry each of his sisters). How about a gondola, or a dumb waiter? At the very least, some oxygen coming out of my cupholder would be awesome if you're not going to make lower-level seats available.

Number Seven: Number Seven

Broncos Fans -- John Elway hasn't taken a snap in over ten years. If you wish to jerk off to the Horse-Faced Colts Draft for the remainder of your existence on this planet, please do so in the confines of your own home.



He was a great quarterback. He didn't win any Pulitzers, and he, last time I checked, didn't cure any major diseases. Get. Over. Him.

Number Six: The Jerseys

An insider tip tells me that both Webster's and Random House will be removing "1) having or showing a lively mood; merry. 2) bright or showy: gay colors. 3) homosexual. 4) a homosexual person, esp. a male" as their definition for "gay" and replacing it with "the collection of hometown fans' jerseys on any given Sunday at InVesCo" in their 2009 edition. For real.



Still sportin' a Romanowski? You're gay. Like how you look in that oversized Mecklenberg throwback? You. Are. Ghey. Let me guess: You pick special Sundays to bust out that Bailey road replica. What? I'm right? Santa's sled rings geigh bells when he prepares to land on your roof. And, please, if you are the proud owner of a Shannon Sharpe jersey, then you, your father, his father, and your son...gay in the mouth. The aforementioned of course excludes any of the following: a) my friends, b) their friends, c) anyone I've ever met, and d) anyone capable of kicking my ass. We're all cool.

Number Five: The Pisser

Hey, remember when you thought it would be a good idea to have like six portable bathrooms within 10 square miles outside your stadium and more for women than men inside?



Good thinkin'. Fucktards.

Number Four: The Cheer

Look, call us Chiefs fans rednecks. Call us hillbillies, and ridicule us for goofing with the national anthem. At least we're original. I will never, in all my time on this planet, understand why BroncosCountry is so infatuated with the two words "Go" and "Broncos." It is with this three-syllabled phrase that every orange-and-blue-clad fan of the Denver club communicates whenever they're discussing football. It is the capital city of Lamesville, the president of Dullvania.



I don't care who you are. When you -- no matter the cadence or the pitch -- shout "Go Broncos," you sound as tough and admirable as pile of dead leaves. I'm begging you all for your own sakes: Coin something new.

Number Three: The Chant

This one's the greatest, and lobbied for a two spot, even. I love it when Broncos fans acknowledge how totally obnoxious, tired, and should've-been-buried-already the "In-Com-Plete!" chant is, and has been, since like two weeks after Steve Bono inspired your old PA dude to say it. Now it's transcended announcers, and the fans keep it up, and even, when the time is right, gather to holler it in opposing venues.



That chant bothered me for about one quarter of Chiefs-Broncos football many moons ago. Now, it only instills empathy from within my heart, for you sad, sad breed of people. But keep doing it. You know, for aesthetics.

Number Two: The Team

I can't say this in any other fashion that would more passionately and confusingly express my sentiments: I hate the Denver Broncos.



I would like more than anything to attend Chiefs-Broncos games, only without the Denver Broncos present.

Number One: The Truth

All name-calling and finger-pointing aside, the Broncos, in my lifetime, have abundantly had more on-the-field success than their 'cross-the-plains rivals, my Chiefs. I never got to fulfill my dreams of taking a knight stick to John Elway's knees in a quiet Englewood pub, and I never got to cram a glowing-red bag of hot, rusty nails down the non-enunciative mouth of Shannon Sharpe. Truth be told, I'm likely too chicken to do either, and certainly not crafty enough to pull those feats off without getting caught, maimed, and/or killed, so maybe it's for the better. The fact remains, though, that no Broncos fan can possibly hate the Chiefs with as much vigor as the reverse. The one exception would be anyone that jumped on the Bronco bandwagon since 1999, and we all know that there has never, in the annals of time, been a Denver fan like that.



Over the course of 30-ish years, Denver has molested the pigskin with better digit manipulation than Kansas City, often at the expense of the Chiefs, and that burns, burns, burns, like, you guessed it, a ring of fire.
Read more

Friday, September 5, 2008

Friday Morning Fracas: The HoG and Categorized 'Skin Tossing 101

Football season is underway. The Giants held off the Redskins last night, in what I'm sure was a dazzling battle, and in what I'm certain is not a precursor to Eli and the G-men winning another title. No, honor will likely go to another squad this year, and I for one, do not think it will be the Dallas Cowboys or the San Diego Chargers. The Patriots? Maybe. Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if Eli's older brother made another run at the Lombardi, and Tony Dungy rode off into the Colt-print sunset of glory. Is that my prediction for who wins it all? No. I'll wait until...mmm...week 14ish to make that pick. Yup. That's how I roll. Either way, Sunday, Sunday, Sunday is when things get exciting, and the trusty ol' House of Georges has some Chiefs/Broncos posts and picks we'll be throwing the way of our readers between now and noon (Central) on Sunday. Until then, let's open an always-successful thread in the comments about gunslingers past, somewhat present, but mostly past.

My interest in doing so is because I found myself confused this morning. This story says the following: "OPEN Sports (www.opensports.com), a new online sports entertainment destination and brainchild of Mike Levy, founder and former CEO of CBS Sportsline.com, has joined forces with the NFL’s all-time winningest quarterback, John Elway, on a multi-year deal. Elway will serve as the spokesman of the recently launched OPEN Sports Fantasy Football suite of products and challenge games."

If you look here, you'll see that Horse-Faced Colts Draft doesn't lead in all-time touchdown passes; in fact, there are two active players already above him. He doesn't make the list here, here, he does however make the top three here, and he does appear here a few times (passes attempted, passes completed, and yards gained), and here twice (the number two slot for most 3000-yard seasons, and the number one slot for most times sacked in a career).

What's more is that he appears at the mumber three slot in a post titled "Top Five NFL Quarterbacks of All Time." This guy, in a similarly titled post, puts him at the two slot, in between Marino and Montana, but adds this caveat:

"However, for those who like to rate greatness on championships won, let’s not forget that Terrell Davis, not Elway, was the driving force in leading the Broncos to their consecutive titles in ’97 and ’98. Had Marino had a back like Davis – and a little defensive help – who know how many rings the Dolphins would have won."


Another post, similar title, gives Elway the two spot again, this time in between Manning and Montana. His reasoning looks like this:

"The greatest quarterback of all time is unquestionably Montana. I mean, there is pretty much no question about it. He has 3 Superbowl MVPs, 4 regular season MVPs and a player of the year award. Oh yeah, and he won four Superbowls. Stats don't mean anything in Joey's case. Because when you needed a play to be made, Montana made it. You need a drive. Montana's got it. You need to milk the clock. Montana's got it. And if you need someone to throw the go-ahead touchdown pass in the biggest game of season, Joe Montana is your man."


Finally, three-spot here, and then there's the author of this post, who thinks only Marino and Favre should be in the conversation for best ever, and lastly, his Pro-Football Reference page, where we find one more career category in which he lands in first place: two-point conversions.

Obviously, we all know that John Elway was a phenomenal quarterback, and ultimately, it could be deemed impossible to determine who was the greatest, second-best, etc. of all time at any position. And essentially, wherever any pass-tosser falls, they're in good company. And naturally, I know for certain that there are plenty of Denver faithfuls that would claim, and likely link to pages where there are reasons listed as to why he's the best. But this claim, an obvious plug for a fantasy-football product, states that he is the NFL's all-time winningest, and we know that Old No. 4 eclipsed that record last year, and Manning, barring significant injury, will likely pass them both before his career is done.

So without any further ado, bring it.
Read more

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Greatest Sports Opinion Ever?

Neal Jones and Marty Wall host a three and-a-half hour sports talk radio show on KCSP 610 AM, Monday-Friday here in Kansas City. (Editor's Note: It's wittily titled "Neal and Marty.")Today, as they do on many days, they spent some time talking about the Chiefs and what to expect from the 2008 season, and Neal Jones said something intelligent. This is not to imply that he usually doesn't, more so to emphasize what so many Chiefs fans seem to have forgotten of late. The hosts also touched on a few points regarding last season, many of which I agree with, and have said so here in the House. Some brief tidbits after the jump...

In 2007, the Kansas City Chiefs finished 32nd out of 32 teams in the NFL in rushing yards. Their passing game was better-than-decent on at least two Sundays out of the 16, so they had that goin' for them, which was nice. I believe they also finished 31st (again, 32 total) in offense, which means that only one team was worse than them when trying to show its O-face. (Note: Today's an odd day, where math comes easy.) They also finished with a win/loss record of 4-12. That means they won four times, lost 12. With me still? That record netted them a tie with Oakland Raiders for last in the AFC West, and deservedly ranked them in the "Damn, you guys really blow" category.

Some would say the flip side is the homerun of a draft they put together in April. To those some, I say please down a can of Ajax with a Lysol back, and crawl to the corner of your backyard to die a wretched poisonous death.

What? I know. We need youth and development, and all that other shit. I get it. Four and fucking 12, though? There are fucking Canadian teams that didn't even come close to qualifying for the Grey Cup laughing at your bitch asses. That is a really horrible team attempting to play American football.

And what, pray tell, did everyone have to say about it in the off-season?

"Brodie Croyle lost all nine games (or whatever fucking number it was) as a starter for the Kansas City Chiefs last year."


To every sad sac one of you pieces of cornhole rash that said that, please make your way to the front of the Ajax shot line now. I've got Cayenney battery acid I plan on shoving in your nostrils while your guts eat themselves, and it's goin' quick.

Let me ask you this: Do you ever hear a bunch of Broncos fans saying "John Elway lost three Super Bowls before he got his two wins?" No, fucksticks. You don't. Why? Because Elway didn't lose those games. The Broncos did. Very badly I might add. They were good teams that had bad days. And last year, the Chiefs were a bad team that had a few good days. Key word there is team.

Almost nobody mentions those team stats that I listed above. Nobody mentions the lack of Larry Johnson's running game. All they talked about was his foot injury and his massive contract. Everybody talked about how awesome Dwayne Bowe was last year. Nobody talked about how there was nobody else to throw the fucking ball to (besides the greatest tight end of all time, of course), and nobody talked about how last year's offensive line was an improvement over the last three years, the tailwinds of the Dick Vermeil/Al Saunders/Willie Roaf/Will Shields glory-days offense. Yeah. Last year's offensive line was an improvement, and they were still really fucking terrible.

So, like I've said before, there's next to nobody to throw to, no time to get a throw off, and no running game to balance your attack, so blame it all on the quarterback who got thrown into this mess five or six games into the season. That's ingenius. You fucking shitdicks. Onto what Jones said on the air today, though:

"By the end of the season -- will it be after the playoffs? (Note: Playoffs?!?) Probably not. But right after the season's over -- we should know if Brodie Croyle is our guy. It's kinda like Tony Pena, Jr. and the Royals. By the mid-point of the season, we should know if (TPJ)'s bat will constitute to keep him on the roster because of his abilities at shortstop."


Thank you, Mr. Jones. Give the guy a chance. Give him the season, and compare season-ending notes with your notes from early September, and figure it out. Not a minute before.
Read more

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Weekday Whippoorwill: 7-23-08

Yes. That's right. Two "original" posts in one day and we're back to the link dumpage. Wanna fight about it?

Kidding. There're a few sports items to gloss over, and not one of them has to do with cell phones or Brett Favre. We'll get after it, just after the jump.

The zany intern Bill over at The Big Lead has uncorked an Oakland newspaper columnist that questions the mantras of one Billy Beane.

All Balls has compiled a top 10 list. The topic? Best athletes whom have posed in Playboy.

Baseball reflections has a handy list of the week (thus far) in MLB transactions.

Rumors and Rants has a great read, a piece of guys who went out on top. Yes. John Elway is in there. Why? I'm not sure. I always thought he liked being on the bottom.

End Zone Buzz is running through NFL divisions and previewing them. Here are their thoughts on the AFC West. In a shocking display of unexpectedness, they think the Chiefs have no shot at the division.

Major League Jerk gifts us this video of two (alleged) playmates interviewing Bronson Arroyo:



Finally, with all of the NFC North chatter going on, it seems as though everyone has forgotten about the Bears. Deadspin thinks the job of quarterback may lie in the fate of a coin flip, while Sports by Brooks informs us that that wicked return specialist Devin Hester seeks more jack.
Read more

Thursday, August 23, 2007

Ifs, Whens and Other Things We Love That Just Might Kill Us: Cherry Creek High's Elway Obsession

Editor's Note: This exchange was first published several months ago on Arrowhead Addict. Old No. 7, in his infinite wisdom, then took it upon himself to publish it on Predominantly Orange. It's not new or news, but this is, and hey -- that's worth something. As is enjoyable reading, so get to it!

Bankmeister: There are a number of topics I'd like to cover with you, and I'm confident I'll get to at least half of one, and never get sidetracked. So here goes: Last week in your Tradition Tuesday post on the House of Georges you talked about the recruitment and development of John Elway's son. You also spoke about your fantasy scenario in which Jack is drafted by the Chiefs after college. I don't get this. Why does this fascinate you?

Old No. 7: When it comes to Young Elway, my first wish would, of course, be for him to follow in his Dad's footsteps and have a Hall Of Fame career for the Denver Broncos. In lieu of that, my secondary wish would be to see him go to a team whose fan base loathes his dad (Cleveland, Green Bay, any AFC West franchise, etc.). I think it would be really, really funny, especially if Jack were a really good college QB and that team really needed a QB. The conflict would amuse me.


B: That's rich. I suppose I could stomach such a twist only if it meant that Young Elway repeatedly defeated the Broncos. You guys would have no idea how to react: you can't hate or boo the son of your god, right? The conflict there would amuse me.

7: Touche. That would suck. You've written in the past about players who've "gone to the dark side" , i.e. played for the Chiefs and then gone to the Broncos. Neil Smith is obviously the most prominent example here, but there are many. I agree, what with my disdain for that ass clown Eddie Kennison. Where would the child (or brother or other relative) of a hated rival fit in on that continuum of fan dislike?

B: It fits in like this: It blows. Period. I suppose it ultimately winds up sucking for the athlete in question, but, you know, screw that guy. He's still hoarding piles of American dollars by simply playing the game he's loved to play his whole life.

I find relatives in sports to be a fascinating topic, though, and I always seem to have mixed emotions about them. As a young Royals fan, I didn't give two seconds of consideration to Ken Brett. He was a pitcher. In the American League, which equals no homeruns, no triples, no base-stealing, etc. Not to mention the fact that his presence on the club forced his kid brother to put that God-awful "G" on the back of his uni.

Fast forward 20 years and I found myself captivated by the Brian Griese situation in Denver. It's strange to admit, let alone think about, but I was totally rooting for that kid. That's some pressure. Here's a guy that the Broncos have tagged as the guy to replace Elway, or Horse-Faced Colts Draft (HFCD) as I like to call him. Here's a franchise that was awful for most of the first two decades it existed. They had the '77 Super Bowl appearance, but not much after until the infamous NFL draft of '83.

Though it took HFCD a couple of seasons to get his game on, he did take them to the big game on four occasions. Granted, those were monstrous losses, but the team was there, showing success, riding the lone draft pick holdout it so savored with every ounce of saliva in its collective mouth. Finally, they win the big one twice, and the king of Denver car sales rides off into the orange sunset of retirement. Literally.

That's a whirlwind of a ride to be a football fan/family in Denver. I'm a firm believer that sports, to a degree, transcend generations within families. I can imagine that, say, yourself, as a child, felt frustration as a Bronco fan, basked in the glory of all those playoffs, exploded with exhiliration when your boys finally won it all, and, when it finally hit you between eyes that your franchise was on the market for a QB, you were like, "What in the world just happened?"

Along comes Griese. A good egg. A talent. The son of Hall-of-Fame pigskin slinger, the one selected to steer that franchise into the new HFCD-less millenium. I posit that one could scarcely finger a larger set of shoes to fill in sports history. Okay. Maybe NFL history.

Say you're a Bills fan, and let's pretend that the Miami Dolphins and the Buffalo Bills (solely because they're in the same division -- I don't portend to know much about football beyond the AFC West) are a bitter, hated rivalry. If your pops watched Bob Griese kill your team on a semi-regular basis, you'd be like, "Man I hate that guy" or "Geez, I wish we had that caliber of talent on our team." So when his son Brian enters the league, you, as a Bills fan, tell your kids how much his dad used to toss around your team back in the day. But you do it with respect.

The kind of respect I had for Brian as a young Bronco. Of course, his performance didn't cut it for Bowlen/Shanahan and the secret phantoms that run the Broncos, and he's gone. One more reason to not like that franchise.

The whole HFCD thing is clearly a massive exception. I'll always hate him for refusing to play for the team that drafted him. I despise Eli Manning for the same reason. Then again, I'm over-idealistic; I'd like for the world to spin the way "it was meant to," even though there's not a formula/set of guidelines for such spinning. Throw in the fact, though, that his daddy pulls the strings for him to play for a "west coast" team (I always found that odd, but I never claimed to have aced geography) that happens to be a division rival.

And the guy really was the come-from-behind maestro. Coincidentally, a lot of those late-game victories were at the expense of my Chiefs.

Thus, to continue not answering your question, the continuum of fan dislike, is an abyss of a black hole for Young Elway. The thought of those five letters on the back of a red and gold jersey literally makes me want to vomit. And of course, there are very few retired numbers in the Chiefs franchise. Seven is not one of them.

7: Man, that was a mouthful. It almost seems as though you'd thought of some of that stuff ahead of hand. I have to vehemently disagree with you when it comes to the end of Griese's Denver career. You said: "...his performance didn't cut it for Bowlen/Shanahan and the secret phantoms that run the Broncos, and he's gone. One more reason to not like that franchise."

Griese's performance did not cut it in general. This is a team with an owner and a coach that will settle for nothing less than Super Bowl championships, and Griese proved not to be the QB to lead the team back to the Big Game. The remainder of his career has validated the decision, as he's never been back to the Pro Bowl, never won a playoff game and never even held on to a starting job for a full season. I think Brian Griese is a good backup NFL QB, and I would have loved for him to stick around in that capacity when they brought Plummer in. The egos and attitudes involved would not allow that, however, and he had to go.

It's a rough business. I was pulling for Griese too, but he didn't have the temperament, the leadership attributes, or the top-level tools he needed to succeed in Denver. That's not because Bowlen and Shanahan are assholes, they merely wield the ax. Griese had the chance, and Griese failed.

I am totally on the same page with you with that initial, though. I always hate it when a player--especially a longtime favorite--has to take on the initial on his nameplate because his dumb brother (or, even worse, someone who coincidentally has the same name) signs up. What I've never understood is why you even need it. George Brett, number 5 in your programs and number 1 in your hearts, did not need an initial. Hell, he didn't need anything on the back of his jersey. No one was going to mix him up with his brother, so just put "Brett" on the back of both of their jerseys and be done with it. I don't understand why this is so hard.

Anyway, back to the kid Elway. Let me ask you this: how much is your view of the relatives of athletes is affected by the fact that almost all of them grew up rich, privileged and with an automatic edge? Part of what we respect about athletes is the incredible amount of work it takes to be good at this stuff, as well as the fact that many of these kids come from broken homes and/or crappy schools. Imagine it's not Elway, but someone you like and respect: how do you feel about his kid as an adult athlete, knowing that he had every advantage, went to the best camps and schools, can network with anyone and oh by the way had a Hall of Famer as a backyard coach since birth?

B: Okay. Points on the Griese topic well-illustrated and intelligent. I think there's a part of me, though, that will always toss a smattering of blame upon the organization/fan base with regard to HFCD's successor solely because of the way things went down with his acquistion, career, and championship status/retirement. I don't mention this to indicate any level of shrewdness or accuracy. I'm simply sayin'.

Kudos on the initials bit as well. It's not that freaking hard. If you know your team, you know your team. You recognize stature, position, tendency, etc. I even found myself annoyed with recent Bronco uniforms. I can't remember who, but in the past four or five years, Denver acquired someone with the same last name as a long-standing member, the end result being initial addage. And it disturbed me to see the uniform of whoever that guy was modified. Same goes for Larry and Derrick Johnson on the current Chiefs roster. I'd never buy either of those guys jerseys because I can't roll through Englewood, or wherever Bronco fans tailgate and have it recognized for the sheer #56. Granted, now that I think about it, several Denver fans would probably be like, "Yo, I thought LJ wore #27."

Anyway. Regarding Kid Elway, I can't really say. That is, I've never considered the background of a son of a former professional athlete. I'm usually having a good day if I know where a kid attended college, so knowing how it was financed would be a giant stretch.

That said, I don't know that I could formulate a quality opinion if I just knew a few details. On the one hand, you'd tend to hate the punk for having the good gear/camps/schools and thus the advantage over the less privileged. The other side to that, though, is that said father worked his butt off to provide these things for his son, and you'd have to acknowledge his entitlement to do so.

Where I'd want to lend extra scrutiny would be whether or not the father made the son earn every bit of the privilege/advantage. Like, "You can have a different pair of Reeboks for each day of the week, but you've got to earn some of the money for them via chores around the house." Or, perhaps you reward the kid with good grades as the incentive: "You can go to John Elway's quarterback camp if you get straight As; come home with less than a 3.0, you're marching to camp Bubby Brister." Something like that.

As far as the backyard coach, I'm all for it. That's what America is all about. With Father's Day weekend here, there've been a lot of Royals commercials on suggesting that you take dad to the game, etc. These ads feature blips with players talking about how their dads taught them how to hit, field and slide. They also acknowledge that their dad was the first to see them hit a AA homerun, or get his first strikeout in the bigs. That junk gives me goose bumps just typing it. I guess that makes me a romantic old sap, but, for my money, the gifts of genetic talent and knowledge of the game that a father gives his son is pure bliss, even if these gushers of moments take place between John and Jack. What about you, though? This exchange has become a bit one-sided. I’m curious to hear your thoughts on the whole relative of a rival conundrum. I’d also be interested in hearing your thoughts on the son of an HOFer having all of the goods lined up for him.

7: I'm pretty sure the numbers/initials combo on the Broncos you're referring to would be the Williams situation. When Darrent was drafted, D.J. put his initials on his shirt. I actually thought this was fine, because his first name is initials. The travesty was when Darrent put his entire first name on, loading his jersey up with more letters than Braves catcher Jarrod Saltalamacchia. As annonying as the initial thing is, it's ten times worse when two guys have the same last name and same first initial, resulting in spelling out both names. Bunk.

Sadly, we're back to only one Williams on the roster. I don't know what D.J. is going to wear on his nameplate, but it's going to remind us of the Williams that's not there, and that sucks.

Also, the Broncos often have had random Smiths on the team, resulting in Rod adding the initial--which pisses me off.

If there’s a player that I don’t like, either as an individual athlete or from a rival team, there is a certain amount of dislike built in for me automatically. Eli Manning is the first example that comes to mind for me. I’ve always despised his brother (although I may be coming around on him, much to my shock and dismay), and so I initially transferred that feeling to Eli. Then about a year ago I consciously decided to give Eli a chance and even felt sorry for him a little bit. That was all until I drafted him for my fantasy league last season and he single handedly destroyed my title chances. So now I hate Eli comepletely on his own merit.



If the son of a rival—like, I don’t know, Marcus Allen’s kid or something—ended up going to Colorado State or signing with the Broncos, I would accept him but hold him to a way different standard than other players. I would be almost predisposed to jump on his ass after a mistake. He could earn my appreciation, but the bar would initially be set a lot higher. It’s a tough call, because players move around so much these days it’s hard to really associate players with one franchise (and thus hate them as much as you hate the rival team).

I don't know how to measure the amount of good parenting or discipline any kid receives, so I will ask you this: All kidding about Jack Elway aside, do you honestly think that Brodie Croyle is the long-term answer for the Chiefs? What have you seen in the kid to make you believe one way or another? What's your best case scenario for play at the quarterback position, and how do you think Cutler will do this year?

B: Great questions, each one of them. Regarding Croyle, I can’t say. In a Chiefs uniform, I’ve only seen him come in for mop-up duty in the infamous Pittsburgh “Passion Party” catastrophe at Three Rivers last year. I know in the small amount of tosses he chucked up, two were picks, one for a touchdown return. So that’s not good, but that team didn’t have its head on straight that day. Prior to being drafted, I saw only snippets of his collegiate play, as well as a decent amount of those quarterback competition things they televise. He seemed to do well.

The one thing I’m staunch about is this: Give him a chance. I don’t care about his pre-NFL injuries, and I don’t care when he gets his chance. I just don’t think you write him off before he’s given a shot similar to what Cutler got last year. My best-case scenario is a fair competition for the starting job, an orchestration that, in my mind, is only winnable (at this point) by Damon Huard. Anyone that thinks otherwise confuses me.

Finally, I think Cutler will do great. I really do. I predict he’ll progress and make good things happen at a rate much quicker than Philip Rivers displayed last year. Of course, some of that is system-related, but Cutler will do real well. I wouldn’t be surprised if he finishes in the top three of AFC qb rating. Some folks aren’t fans of that statistic, but it really is a good yardstick. What do you think about Croyle/Huard? And, are you as optimistic as I am --or more -- on how Cutler will do?

7: Ah, the Passion Party. Easily my favorite NFL story of last season, eclipsing even Making It Rain. Here’s my read on Croyle and Huard: If Herm is serious about winning this year, with this team, he’ll play the veteran. Huard is clearly more ready to win games right now. You were in the playoffs last year and you bring most of the team back. If you feel as though you’re playing for the future, then no question you go with the kid, especially since career backup Huard can not raise any kind of a stink about going back to the clipboard.

And by “playing for the future,” I don’t mean giving up on the season. If the two QBs are close in ability, and you’ve seen Huard’s ceiling, then let the young man show his stuff. Besides, if Elway Junior’s going to suit up in KC you need to shake thing out sooner rather than later. But it takes a commitment, without waffling. I actually respect the way Shanahan handled the QB transition last year, even if it cost us a playoff spot. The people that were calling for Cutler in Week One made me want to load and fire. In that spot you absolutely had to get what you could out of Plummer. And when Jake’s ineffectiveness was crippling the team, you had to go to the first-round pick, even if he wasn’t ready to take a team to the postseason. It was a frustrating season but necessary for the future of the team.

And I think that future is positive with Cutler. He still has a rather large unknown quality, and I’m a little weirded out by the Vanderbilt thing. All of that college footage could have been fabricated (like the moon landing) and no one would know about it. He still feels like a stranger in our house because we didn’t know him in college. Hell, even Roethlisberger played (and destroyed) CSU when he was at Miami of Ohio. I do think Cutler has the tools and the temperament to be hugely successful. I don’t know about that top-three prediction, because he’d have to beat out a lot of good arms to get there, but eventually he will be a major star and win a lot of games.

He is JC, The Messiah, Mr. Universe (link here) and even if he wasn’t born on Christmas he is from Santa Claus, Indiana. He will lead the Chosen Fans out of the Wilderness and to the Promised Land, Hallelujah, Hallelujah.


Read more